OSV 1.4.0 · github-reviewed · 修改于 2026-06-12 04:28
发布时间
2026-06-12 04:28
GitHub 审查时间
2026-06-12 04:28
NVD 发布时间
2026-06-11 06:17
源文件
advisories/github-reviewed/2026/06/GHSA-g9g7-5cgw-6v28/GHSA-g9g7-5cgw-6v28.json
In the russh client keyboard-interactive authentication path, a malicious SSH server could send a USERAUTH_INFO_REQUEST with an attacker-controlled prompt count, and the client would use that raw count directly in Vec::with_capacity(...) before validating that enough prompt data was actually present in the packet.
This is a client-side denial-of-service / resource-exhaustion issue on the keyboard-interactive auth path.
The vulnerable code path is in:
russh/src/client/encrypted.rsWhen the client is in CurrentRequest::KeyboardInteractive state and receives SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_INFO_REQUEST, it parses:
nameinstructionslanguage tagn_promptsBefore the fix, the code then did:
let n_prompts = map_err!(u32::decode(&mut r))?;
let mut prompts = Vec::with_capacity(n_prompts.try_into().unwrap_or(0));
That means a malicious server could advertise an enormous n_prompts value even if the packet contained no prompt bodies at all.
The fix rejects inconsistent prompt counts before allocating:
let n_prompts = map_err!(u32::decode(&mut r))?;
let max_prompts = r.remaining_len() / 5;
let n_prompts = n_prompts as usize;
if n_prompts > max_prompts {
return Err(crate::Error::Inconsistent.into());
}
let mut prompts = Vec::with_capacity(n_prompts);
Each prompt needs at least 4 bytes of string length plus 1 byte of echo flag, so remaining_len() / 5 is a safe upper bound. If the declared count exceeds what the packet can actually contain, the packet is malformed and is now rejected instead of being silently truncated.
The tester did not find a same-class server-side bug in the reciprocal USERAUTH_INFO_RESPONSE path. The server already bounds the response count by remaining packet length before allocating.
Affected package and versions:
russh0.37.00.60.2The tester does not believe this issue affects the other crates in this workspace (russh-config, russh-cryptovec, pageant, or russh-util).
An in-tree regression test was added:
client::tests::oversized_keyboard_interactive_prompt_count_is_rejectedThe test builds a client session in WaitingAuthRequest(KeyboardInteractive) state, feeds it a synthetic USERAUTH_INFO_REQUEST packet with:
nameinstructionsn_prompts = u32::MAXOn the fixed code, the client rejects the packet with Error::Inconsistent and does not emit a reply to the caller.
For old-code impact verification, the pre-fix path was also checked separately with a constrained-memory repro. On unfixed upstream/main, the same malformed packet attempted a very large allocation and failed with:
memory allocation of 137438953440 bytes failed
Relevant verification commands:
cargo test -p russh oversized_keyboard_interactive_prompt_count_is_rejected -- --nocapture
cargo test -p russh --lib --no-default-features --features ring oversized_keyboard_interactive_prompt_count_is_rejected -- --nocapture
Suggested CVSS v3.1:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H6.5Reasoning:
AV:N: reached by a malicious SSH server over the networkAC:L: the packet format is straightforwardPR:N: no prior authentication requiredUI:R: the victim must initiate a connection and proceed into keyboard-interactive authC:N, I:N: Confidentiality or integrity impact were not demonstratedA:H: the server can drive a very large allocation attempt in the client auth path, which can abort or exhaust client-side resources depending on allocator and platform behavior